Survey of Adhesive Systems Knowledge Among Conservative Dentistry Specialist Dentist in Indonesia

  • Citra Kusumasari Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-0006
  • Iffi Aprillia Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-3228
  • Wiku Melisa Wijayanti Undergraduate Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ahmed Abdou Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah, Iraq

Abstract

 
Introduction: Knowledge of adhesive systems is an essential item in creating a successful tooth restoration. Adhesive systems are common among dentists in Indonesia, but no research has been found that evaluates the knowledge of the members of Indonesian Conservative Dentistry Association (IKORGI) - Central Jakarta Branch. Objectives: to determine dentists’ understanding regarding the use of adhesive systems during restorative procedures. Methods: This research used a descriptive study with a cross-sectional questionnaire design. One hundred and five dentist specialists in IKORGI - Central Jakarta Branch, completed an online survey form within two months comprising three sections: (a) demographics (6 items), (b) knowledge about the latest technology of adhesive systems (5 items), and (c) clinical implications of adhesive systems (10 items). Data was collected and analyzed using Microsoft excel and IBM SPSS. Results: The primary data was dominated by the female with the range of 0 to 5 years of experience since graduated from conservative dentistry program. They understood the adhesive system quite well, as seen from the maximum score of the respondents was 4.25. Among participants, 63.8% to 99% showed a strong knowledge about the adhesion terminology and type of adhesives. Conclusions: The understanding of adhesive systems knowledge among dentist specialists in IKORGI - Central Jakarta Branch is good, although there are some significant differences between the research variables. Further research is required to cover all areas of Indonesia with or without specialty in conservative dentistry.

References

Kusumasari C, Hatayama T, Shimada Y. Replacement of Two Failed Indirect Restorations with Direct Bonded Restorations Using Minimally Invasive Strategy. J Dent Indones. 2021;28(3):198-204. doi:https://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v28i3.1304
Kusumasari C, Abdou A, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Deproteinization of caries-affected dentin with chemo-mechanical caries removal agents and its effect on dentin bonding with self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2021;109(November 2020):103665. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103665
Mackenzie L, Banerjee A. Minimally invasive direct restorations: A practical guide. Br Dent J. 2017;223(3):163-171. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.661
Kusumasari C, Hayashi M, Shimada Y. Uncut Enamel for Optimizing Bonded Composite Restoration on Multiple Diastema Closure Cases Uncut Enamel for Optimizing Bonded Composite Restoration on Multiple Diastema Closure Cases. 2022;29(2):140-146. doi:10.14693/jdi.v29i2.1343
van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From buonocore’s pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratlves. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dentai adheslve technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7-34. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a43994
Eshrak Sofan, PhD Afrah Sofan, PhD Gaspare Palaia, PhD Gianluca Tenore, MD, DDS Umberto Romeo, MD, DDS Guido Migliau, MD D. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017;8(1):1-17.
Vinagre A, Ramos J, Marques F, Chambino A, Messias A, Mata A. Randomized clinical trial of five adhesive systems in occlusal restorations: One-year results. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(3):397-406. doi:10.4012/dmj.2019-011
Arandi NZ, Thabet M. Knowledge and Attitudes of Dentists toward Adhesive System Selection: A Cross-sectional Study from Palestine. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020;10(1):107-115.
Susanti A, Soemitro RAA, Suprayitno H, Ratnasari V. Searching the Appropriate Minimum Sample Size Calculation Method for Commuter Train Passenger Travel Behavior Survey. J Infrastruct Facil Asset Manag. 2019;1(1):47-60. doi:10.12962/jifam.v1i1.5232
Matheson GJ. We need to talk about reliability: Making better use of test-retest studies for study design and interpretation. PeerJ. 2019;2019(5):1-25. doi:10.7717/peerj.6918
Bolarinwa O. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(4):195. doi:10.4103/1117-1936.173959
Taherdoost H. Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument ; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire / Survey in a Research Hamed Taherdoost To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-02546799 Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument ; How to Test the. Int J Acad Res Manag. 2016;5(3):28-36.
Surdu S, Mertz E, Langelier M, Moore J. Dental Workforce Trends: A National Study of Gender Diversity and Practice Patterns. Med Care Res Rev. 2021;78(1_suppl):30S-39S.
Kærsgaard JLB, Christensen MK, Søndergaard PY, Naukkarinen J. Gender differences in dentistry: A qualitative study on students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for entering dentistry at higher education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021;25(3):495-505. doi:10.1111/eje.12625
Celik ZC, Cubukcu CE, Ozkaya G. Self-awareness of X, Y, and Z generations for dental health: A comparative clinical study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(10):1471-1475. doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_3_21
Spallek H, Turner SP, Donate-Bartfield E, et al. Social Media in the Dental School Environment, Part A: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations for Use. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(10):1140-1152.
Burns LE, Abbassi E, Qian X, Mecham A, Simeteys P, Mays KA. YouTube use among dental students for learning clinical procedures: A multi-institutional study. J Dent Educ. 2020;84(10):1151-1158. doi:10.1002/jdd.12240
Zhao Z, Wang Q, Zhao J, Zhao B, Ma Z, Zhang C. Adhesion of Teeth. Front Mater. 2021;7(January):1-11. doi:10.3389/fmats.2020.615225
Abad-Coronel C, Naranjo B, Valdiviezo P. Adhesive systems used in indirect restorations cementation: Review of the literature. Dent J. 2019;7(3). doi:10.3390/dj7030071
N M, Jain N. Options for Dentin Bonding - Total Etch Or Self Etch? Int J Contemp Dent. 2011;2(2):1-4.
Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: Effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(12):1621-1629. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0109
Kaur A, Manihani DS, Mulay S, et al. Effect of total-etch and self-etch adhesives on the bond strength of composite to glass-ionomer cement/resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in the sandwich technique-A systematic review. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2000;1. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1480.
Dhaduk R. Rubber Dam Isolation. Essentials Dent Quick Rev Exam Prep. 2012;28(2):1-1. doi:10.5005/jp/books/11480_1
Olegário IC, Moro BLP, Tedesco TK, et al. Use of rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation on composite resin restorations’ survival in primary molars: 2-year results from a non-inferiority clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):1-13. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02449-y
Falacho RI, Melo EA, Marques JA, Ramos JC, Guerra F, Blatz MB. Clinical evaluation of the effect of rubber dam isolation on bond strength to enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;(September 2022):48-55. doi:10.1111/jerd.12979
Keys W, Carson SJ. Rubber dam may increase the survival time of dental restorations. Evid Based Dent. 2017;18(1):19-20. doi:10.1038/sj.ebd.6401221
Kusumasari C, Margono A, Aditya DR, Abdou A. Effect of etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes in universal adhesives on push-out bond strength of fiber post. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(8):e661-e668. doi:10.4317/jced.59564
Theodor Y, Koesmaningati H, Gita F. Adhesive capability of total-etch, self-etch, and self-adhesive systems for fiber post cementation. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017;884:012098. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/884/1/012098
Demirel G, Baltacioǧlu IH. The influence of different etching modes and etching time periods on micro-shear bond strength of multi-mode universal adhesives on dentin. J Stomatol. 2019;72(3):118-128. doi:10.5114/jos.2019.87527
Badavannavar AN, Ajari S, Nayak KUS, Khijmatgar S. Search Pubmed for Abfraction : Etiopathogenesis , clinical aspect , and diagnostic-treatment modalities : A review This article has been cited by. 2023:2023. doi:10.4103/ijdr.IJDR
Szesz A, Parreiras S, Reis A, Loguercio A. Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.009
Bagherian A, Sarraf Shirazi A, Sadeghi R. Adhesive systems under fissure sealants: yes or no?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(6):446-456.
Zafar MS, Ahmed N. The effects of acid etching time on surface mechanical properties of dental hard tissues. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(3):315-320. doi:10.4012/dmj.2014-083
Burrer P, Dang H, Par M, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Article effect of over-etching and prolonged application time of a universal adhesive on dentin bond strength. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(12):1-10. doi:10.3390/polym12122902
Gindri LD, Fröhlich TT, Rosso CR, Rocha R de O. Etching time and bonding of adhesive systems to dentin of primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;31(1):122-130. doi:10.1111/ipd.12711
Published
2023-12-29
How to Cite
KUSUMASARI, Citra et al. Survey of Adhesive Systems Knowledge Among Conservative Dentistry Specialist Dentist in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Dental Association, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 75-85, dec. 2023. ISSN 2621-6175. Available at: <http://jurnal.pdgi.or.id/index.php/jida/article/view/1077>. Date accessed: 26 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.32793/jida.v6i3.1077.
Section
Research Article