The Effect of Bonding Agents IV Generation and Universal on Shear Bond Strength of Nanofiller Resin Composites on Enamel

Baiq Vinnisa Namira Putri; Melaniwati Melaniwati

doi:10.32793/jida.v7i1.917

Baiq Vinnisa Namira Putri Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Univeristas Trisakti, Indonesia
Melaniwati Melaniwati Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32793/jida.v7i1.917

Abstract

Introduction: Composite resins require a bonding material in their attachment to the tooth surface. IV generation is the gold standard because it has high bond strength in tooth structure and durability in long-term use with the total-etch technique. Universal bonding is the newest generation that can be applied in total-etch, self-etch, or selective etch, and it has high bond strength to the enamel. The measurement of the strength by the bonding material against the tooth surface can be measured by using a shear bond strength test. Objective: To determine the effect of generation IV and universal bonding (total-etch, self-etch) on the shear bond strength of nanofiller composite resin on the enamel surface. Methods: A total of 30 mandibular premolars were divided into three groups. In the first group, bonding generation IV (Optibond FL, Kerr) was used. Universal bonding (Optibond Universal, Kerr) were used in the second group as total-etch, and in self-etch in the third group. The composite resin used was a nanofiller composite resin (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE). After restorations were applied, specimens were stored in incubator at 37˚C for 24 hours and then tested at 0.5 mm/min with universal testing machine. Results: one-way ANOVA test showed that there was a significant difference in each treatment group (p<0.05), and there was a significant difference in the generation IV bonding with the universal bonding in self-etch technique at the Tukey post-hoc test (p<0.05). Conclusion: There is an effect of generation IV bonding and universal bonding (total-etch, self-etch) on the shear bond strength of nanofiller composite resin on enamel.

References

Dede DÖ, Şahin O, Koroglu A, Yilmaz B. Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(1):119–28.
Sakaguchi L R, Powers M J, editors. Composites and Polymers. In: Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 12th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier; 2012. p. 167.
Ritter A, Boushell L, Walter R, editors. Dental Biomaterials. In: Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 7th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016. p. 469.
Susra W, Nur DL, Puspita S. Perbedaan Kekuatan Geser dan Kekuatan Tarik pada Restorasi Resin Komposit Microhybrid dengan Bonding Generasi V dan Bonding Generasi VII. Ijd. 2013;02(02):68–75.
Olek A, Klimek L, Bottacz-Rzepkowska E. Comparative scanning electron microscope analysis of the enamel of permanent human, bovine and porcine teeth. J Vet Sci. 2020;21(6):1–14.
Li F, Zhang L, Weir MD, Cheng L, Zhang K, Xu HHK. Material-Tissue Interfacial Phenomena: Contributions from Dental and Craniofacial Reconstructions. 1st ed. Cambridge: Woodhead; 2016.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From buonocore’s pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratlves. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7–34.
Francis T, Sakkir N, Soe HHK, Yeow TY, Hwe HZ, Tze ALM. Post-operative Sensitivity of Selective-Etch and Total-Etch Techniques in Composite Resin Restorations: An In-Vivo Study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2020;1–4.
Carvalho AO, Bacelar-Sá R, Wodevotzky O, Ambrosano GMB, Magne PC, Giannini M. Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage. Appl Adhes Sci. 2016;4(1):1–2.
Anusavice K, Shen C, Ralph R, editors. Bonding and Bonding Agents. In: Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. St. Louis, Missouri; 2012. p. 264.
Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez I, Muñoz MA, Szesz AL, Cuadros-Sánchez J, Reis A. A comprehensive laboratory screening of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. Oper Dent. 2014;39:653.
Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new “multi-mode” adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012;40:475–484.
Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, et al. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2016;41(5):520–530.
Kim JH, Chae SY, Lee Y, Han GJ, Cho BH. Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Oper Dent. 2015;40(1):55–62.
Tsuchiya K, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsubota K, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, et al. Effect of a functional monomer (MDP) on the enamel bond durability of single-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124:96–102.
Beltrami R, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Allegretti J, Poggio C. Comparison of shear bond strength of universal adhesives on etched and nonetched enamel. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016;14(1):78–83.
Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(6):2121–31.
Poggio C, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Chiesa M, Scribante A. Influence of dentin pretreatment on bond strength of universal adhesives. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017;3:30–35.
Diana S, Santosa P, Daradjati S. Perbedaan Kekuatan Geser Perlekatan Resin Komposit Packable dengan Intermediate Layer Resin Komposit Flowable Menggunakan Bonding Total-Etch dan Self Adhesive Flowable Terhadap Dentin. J Ked Gi. 2014;5(2):209–218.
Sakaguchi L R, Powers M J, editors. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 13rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2012.
Poggio C, Scribante A, Della Zoppa F, Colombo M, Beltrami R, Chiesa M. Shear bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives to enamel: Effect of acid pretreatment. Dent Traumatol. 2014;30(1):43–48.
Salem AA, Nassif MS, El-Korashy DI. Durability of bond strength to dentin using two universal adhesives in different etching modes. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2021;20:1–15.
Staxrud F, Valen H. Potential of universal bonding agents for composite repair. Biomater Investig Dent. 2022;9(1):41–46.
Steiner R, Edelhoff D, Stawarczyk B, Dumfahrt H, Lente I. Effect of dentin bonding agents, various resin composites and curing modes on bond strength to human dentin. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(20):1–10.
Sundari I, Arifin R, Maulida R. Shear Bond Strength Bracket Metal dengan Bahan Adhesif Chemically Cured dan Light Cured yang Terkontaminasi Saliva Terhadap Email. J Syiah Kuala Dent Soc. 2017;2(1):6–11.
Jain A, Ray S, Mitra R, Chopra SS. Light Cure Tip Distance and Shear Bond Strength: Does it have any Clinical Significance? J Indian Orthod Soc. 2013;47(3):135–142.
Bektas OO, Hürmüzlü F, Eren D. Effect of the composite curing light mode on polymerization shrinkage of resin composites. Cumhur Dent J. 2012;15(1):1–6.
Garoushi S, Lassila L, Vallittu PK. Impact of fast high-intensity versus conventional light-curing protocol on selected properties of dental composites. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(6): 13–15.
Vandewalle KS, Swift EJ. Estimated light exposure time for composite resin restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;23(4):201–4.
Lima AF, de Andrade KMG, da Cruz Alves LE, Soares GP, Marchi GM, Aguiar FHB, et al. Influence of light source and extended time of curing on microhardness and degree of conversion of different regions of a nanofilled composite resin. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(2):153–7.