Analysis of mandibular length, width, and height in patients with hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus

Mahindra Awwaludin Romdlon; Lusi Epsilawati

doi:10.32793/jrdi.v10i1.1378

Authors

Mahindra Awwaludin Romdlon Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dental Medicine Program, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia, Indonesia
Lusi Epsilawati Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32793/jrdi.v10i1.1378

Keywords:

Hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, mandibular morphology, panoramic radiography, ImageJ

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the mandible's length, width, and height in patients with hypertension and T2DM through panoramic radiography.

Materials and Methods: This study used the observational analytical description method, which has been used in this study with a cross-sectional approach. The sample consisted of 48 panoramic radiographs from 24 patients with hypertension and T2DM, divided into two age groups: those under 60 and those 60 years or older. The radiographs were analyzed using ImageJ to measure the mandible's length, height, and width, and the results were averaged.

Results: The study found no significant differences in the length, width, or height of the mandible between the disease groups or the age groups.

Conclusion: The mandible's length, width, and height values in hypertension and T2DM do not show statistically significant differences. This explains that the bone quality between patients with hypertension and T2DM is not much different.

References

1. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2020 Jun 1;75(6):1334–57

2. World Health Organization. World Health Organization. 2021. Hypertension. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension

3. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Hasil Utama Riskesdas 2018. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI; 2018. p. 152-163

4. Classification Of Diabetes Mellitus 2019 Classification of diabetes mellitus. 2019. p. 5-6

5. Khardori R. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Medscape; 2022

6. Ghosh M, Majumdar SR. Antihypertensive medications, bone mineral density, and fractures: a review of old cardiac drugs that provides new insights into osteoporosis. Endocrine. 2014;46:397-405

7. Hussein MK, Fatah AA. The effect of hypertension and beta-blocker antihypertensive drug on bone mineral density value at the mandibular cortex in mental and gonial regions in hounsfield unite using computed tomographic study. Journal of Al Rafidain University College. 2016;38:33–47

8. Wongdee K, Krishnamra N, Charoenphandhu N. Derangement of calcium metabolism in diabetes mellitus: negative outcome from the synergy between impaired bone turnover and intestinal calcium absorption. J Physiol Sci. 2017;67:71-81

9. Göller Bulut D, Bayrak S, Ankarali H. Mandibular indexes and fractal properties on the panoramic radiographs of the patients using aromatase inhibitors. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1091):20180442

10. Akay G, Akarslan Z, Karada? Ö, Güngör K. Does tooth loss in the mandibular posterior region have an effect on the mental index and panoramic mandibular index? Eur Oral Res. 2019;53(2):56–61

11. Gupta S, Jain S. Orthopantomographic Analysis for Assessment of Mandibular Asymmetry. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2012;46(1):33-7

12. David AP, Varma B, Kurup S, Sam DM, Aravind MS, Chandy ML. Assessment of panoramic radiomorphometric indices of mandible in diabetes mellitus patients and non diabetic individuals. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017;11(11):35–9

13. Epsilawati L, Pramanik F, Ambarlita Y. Assessments of the mandibular cortical bone quality in patient with diabetes mellitus tipe II. JPKM. 2018;2(2):118–23

14. Epsilawati L. Hubungan penurunan tulang alveolar dan penipisan tulang kortikal mandibula pada penderita periodontitis disertai diabetes mellitus tipe 2 menggunakan radiografi cone beam computed tomografi-3D. IJAS. 2012;2(2):86–9

15. He B, Yin L, Zhang M, Lyu Q, Quan Z, Ou Y. Causal effect of blood pressure on bone mineral density and fracture: a mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:716681

16. Takaoka S, Yamaguchi T, Tanaka K ichiro, Morita M, Yamamoto M, Yamauchi M, et al. Fracture risk is increased by the complication of hypertension and treatment with calcium channel blockers in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. J Bone Miner Metab. 2013;31(1):102–7

17. Ye Z, Lu H, Liu P. Association between essential hypertension and bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(40):68916–27

18. Patil SM, Khalikar AN, Deogade SC, Parate AR, Bansod S, Naitam D. Assessment of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral density in controlled type ii diabetes in completely edentulous patients using cone-beam computed tomography-a cross sectional study with comparison group. Open J Stomatol. 2021;11(10):422–36

19. Aslam MS, Ahmad MS, Riaz H, Raza SA, Hussain S, Qureshi OS, et al. Role of Flavonoids as Wound Healing Agent. In: Phytochemicals - Source of Antioxidants and Role in Disease Prevention. InTech; 2018. p.95-102

20. Kaplan S, Smith SRW, Zuckerman IH. Blood pressure and bone mineral density in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Womens Health. 2010;19(6):1209–15

21. Lary CW, Hinton AC, Nevola KT, Shireman TI, Motyl KJ, Houseknecht KL, et al. Association of beta blocker use with bone mineral density in the framingham osteoporosis study: a cross?sectional study. JBMR Plus. 2020;4(9):1-9

22. Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Bozkurt M, Uygur HS, Papay FA, Zins JE. Dentition, Bone Loss, and the Aging of the Mandible. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(7):967–74

23. Mughal AM, Hassan N, Ahmed A. Bone age assessment methods: a critical review. Pak J Med Sci. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(1):211-5