Perbedaan kualitas hasil radiograf periapikal antara film konvensional dan film instan di Instalasi Radiologi FKG Universitas Brawijaya Malang

Farihah Septina; Robbyn Reyvaldo

doi:10.32793/jrdi.v4i1.447

Farihah Septina Departemen Radiologi Kedokteran Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia, 65145 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8283-250X
Robbyn Reyvaldo Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia, 65145

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32793/jrdi.v4i1.447

Abstract

Objectives: This study is aimed to look at the distribution of the quality of periapical radiographs produced by students using conventional films and instant films at the Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Brawijaya radiology installation.
Material and Methods: The method used in this research is analytic descriptive with cross sectional sampling method. The research datas were primary data with a total of 20 periapical radiographs from each method. Data was analyzed by Spearman test in SPSS software.
Results: Data were analysed using the Spearman rho correlation test which showed the results of ρ = 0,5. The results of periapical radiographs using conventional films as much as 65% were very good, 25% were good, and 10% were not acceptable. The results of periapical radiographs using instant film were 70% good, 15% very good, and 15% were not acceptable.
Conclusion: There is no difference in the quality of the results of conventional periapical radiographs and instant films in the radiology installation of the Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Brawijaya Malang.

Author Biographies

Farihah Septina, Departemen Radiologi Kedokteran Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia, 65145

Staff

Robbyn Reyvaldo, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia, 65145

Program Studi Sarjana Kedokteran Gigi

References

Williamson G.F, Miles DA, Van Dis ML, et al. Radiographic Imaging for the Dental Team, 4th Ed. St. Louis, MO. Saunders. 2009:139-52
Hammo M. 2008. Tips for Endodontik Radiography. Smile Dental Journal; 2008; 3: p. 32-4
Whaites E, Drage N. 2013. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology, Fifth Edition. London : Churchill Livingstone.
Ireland R. 2015. Kamus Kedokteran Gigi. Jakarta : EGC
Ishaq W. 2015. Tingkat Penggunaan Radiografi Periapikal Pada Dokter Gigi Praktek Di Kabupaten Maros Terhadap Perawatan Endodontik. Tugas Akhir. Tidak diterbitkan, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Hasanudin, 2015.
Masserat V., Ebrahimi HS.. Eil N., Mollashahi J.,Naebi M. 2017. Evaluation of Frequency of Periapical Radiographic errors in Dental Radiology Department in Zahedan in 2014-2015. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS), vol 1B, h 112-115.
Haghnegahdar A, Bronoosh P, Taheri M, Farjood A. Common intraoral radiographic errors made by dental students. GMJ 2013; 2; 44-8.
Peker I, Alkur M. T. 2009. Evaluation of radiographic errors made by undergraduate dental students in eriapical radiography. NYSDJ., 9:45-8.
Firman, R. 2003. Perkembangan dan Penggunaan Radiografi Dalam Bidang Kedokteran: Journal Of The Indonesian Dental Assosiation: 319-22.
White S.C, Pharoah M.J. 2009. Oral Radiology : Principles and Interpretation. Mosby : Elsevier
Whaites E. 2007. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology, Fourth Edition. London : Churchill Livingstone.
Anil G. Ghom dan Savita A. Ghom. 2014. Text Book of Oral Medicine. New Delhi: Jaypee Brother Publisher.
Suryantoro, Rio. 2007. Perbedaan Detil Gambaran Radiografis Obyek Interdental Pada Model Gigi Menggunakan Film Instan Dengan Dan Tanpa Filter. Jakarta : Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia.
Bafagih IAB. 2017. Persentase Jenis Kegagalan Radiograf Periapikal di RSGM UMY Yang Diterima Oleh Mahasiswa Profesi Kedokteran Gigi UMY Angkatan 2015. Tugas Akhir. Tidak diterbitkan, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Muhamadiyah Yogyakarta, 2017.