Klasifikasi impaksi gigi molar ketiga melalui pemeriksaan radiografi sebagai penunjang odontektomi
Abstract
Objectives: Odontectomy is a common procedure in the extraction of third molars. Assessment of the difficulty level of extraction of third molars can be evaluated based on the classification of impaction. This article aims to discuss how the classification of impaction in third molars evaluates the difficulty of odontectomy treatment through radiographic examination.Literature Review: Literature search was carried out from various electronic databases with article inclusion criteria that discussed the validity of third molar impaction classification through radiography.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this review, it can be concluded that various stratified classifications are suggested as index that can be considered and recommended in the assessment of the difficulty level of third molar odontectomy.
References
Lima CJ, Silva LCF, Melo MRS, Santos JASS, Santos TS. Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal [Internet]. 2012;17(2):281–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17483
Vig KWL. Patient specific variables are a consideration in the decision to extract asymptomatic third molars. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2012;12(2):92–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.03.008
Stacchi C, Daugela P, Berton F, Lombardi T, Juodzbalys G. A classification for assessing surgical difficulty in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars: Description and clinical validation. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2018;49(9):745–53.
Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of Difficulty in Third Molar Surgery-A Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2009;67(4):771–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010
Winter GB. Chapter V: Radiographic interpretation of the crown of the impacted mandibular third. Princ exodontia as Appl to impacted third molar a Complet treatise Oper Tech with Clin diagnoses Radiogr Interpret [Internet]. 1926;42–5. Available from: https://openlibrary.org/boo
ks/OL6696325M/Principles_of_exodontia_as_applied_to_the_impacted_mandibular_third_molar
Khojastepour L, Khaghaninejad MS. Does the Winter or Pell and Gregory Classification System Indicate the Apical Position of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ? J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2019;77(11):2222.e1-2222.e9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.
2019.06.004
Garcia R, Henshaw M, Krall E. Relationship between periodontal disease and systemic health. Periodontol 2000. 2001;25:21–36.
Gümrükçü Z, Balaban E, Karabağ M. Is there a relationship between third ‑ molar impaction types and the dimensional / angular measurement values of posterior mandible according to Pell & Gregory / Winter Classification ? Oral Radiol [Internet]. 2020;(0123456789). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00420-2
Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. 1933.
Brown BR, Sabino MA. Impacted Teeth. In: Atlas of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Missouri: Saunders Elsevier Inc.; 2016.
MacGregor AJ. The radiological assessment of ectopic lower third molars. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1979;61(2):107–13.
Latt MM, Chewpreecha P, Wongsirichat N. Prediction of difficulty in impacted lower third molars extraction ; review literature. Mahidol Dent J. 2015;35(3):281–90.
Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40(1):26–31.
Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Méndez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Somoza-Martin JM, … García-García A. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45(1):23–6.
Rood JP, Nooraldeen Shehab BAA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28(1):20–5.
Spiotto MT, Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular Third Molar Impaction: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res [Internet]. 2013 Jun 11;4(2):1–12. Available from: http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2013/2/e1/v4n2e1ht.pdf
Zhang X, Wang L, Gao Z. Development of a New Index to Assess the Difficulty Level of Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars in an Asian Population. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2019;77(7):1358.e1-1358.e8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.005
Kumar S, Reddy MP, Chandra L, Bhatnagar A. The “Red Line” Conundrum: A Concept Beyond Its Expiry Date? J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13(4):612–4.
García AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38(6):585–7.
Renton T, Smeeton Y, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J [Internet]. 2001 Jun 9;190(11):607–10. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/4801052
Kim J, Cha I. Which Risk Factors Are Associated With Neurosensory Deficits of Inferior Alveolar Nerve After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction ? YJOMS [Internet]. 2012;70(11):2508–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.004
Vig KWL. Patient specific variables are a consideration in the decision to extract asymptomatic third molars. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2012;12(2):92–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.03.008
Stacchi C, Daugela P, Berton F, Lombardi T, Juodzbalys G. A classification for assessing surgical difficulty in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars: Description and clinical validation. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2018;49(9):745–53.
Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of Difficulty in Third Molar Surgery-A Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2009;67(4):771–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010
Winter GB. Chapter V: Radiographic interpretation of the crown of the impacted mandibular third. Princ exodontia as Appl to impacted third molar a Complet treatise Oper Tech with Clin diagnoses Radiogr Interpret [Internet]. 1926;42–5. Available from: https://openlibrary.org/boo
ks/OL6696325M/Principles_of_exodontia_as_applied_to_the_impacted_mandibular_third_molar
Khojastepour L, Khaghaninejad MS. Does the Winter or Pell and Gregory Classification System Indicate the Apical Position of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ? J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2019;77(11):2222.e1-2222.e9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.
2019.06.004
Garcia R, Henshaw M, Krall E. Relationship between periodontal disease and systemic health. Periodontol 2000. 2001;25:21–36.
Gümrükçü Z, Balaban E, Karabağ M. Is there a relationship between third ‑ molar impaction types and the dimensional / angular measurement values of posterior mandible according to Pell & Gregory / Winter Classification ? Oral Radiol [Internet]. 2020;(0123456789). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00420-2
Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. 1933.
Brown BR, Sabino MA. Impacted Teeth. In: Atlas of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Missouri: Saunders Elsevier Inc.; 2016.
MacGregor AJ. The radiological assessment of ectopic lower third molars. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1979;61(2):107–13.
Latt MM, Chewpreecha P, Wongsirichat N. Prediction of difficulty in impacted lower third molars extraction ; review literature. Mahidol Dent J. 2015;35(3):281–90.
Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40(1):26–31.
Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Méndez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Somoza-Martin JM, … García-García A. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45(1):23–6.
Rood JP, Nooraldeen Shehab BAA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28(1):20–5.
Spiotto MT, Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular Third Molar Impaction: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res [Internet]. 2013 Jun 11;4(2):1–12. Available from: http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2013/2/e1/v4n2e1ht.pdf
Zhang X, Wang L, Gao Z. Development of a New Index to Assess the Difficulty Level of Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars in an Asian Population. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2019;77(7):1358.e1-1358.e8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.005
Kumar S, Reddy MP, Chandra L, Bhatnagar A. The “Red Line” Conundrum: A Concept Beyond Its Expiry Date? J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13(4):612–4.
García AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38(6):585–7.
Renton T, Smeeton Y, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J [Internet]. 2001 Jun 9;190(11):607–10. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/4801052
Kim J, Cha I. Which Risk Factors Are Associated With Neurosensory Deficits of Inferior Alveolar Nerve After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction ? YJOMS [Internet]. 2012;70(11):2508–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.004
Published
2020-05-10
How to Cite
LITA, Yurika Ambar; HADIKRISHNA, Indra.
Klasifikasi impaksi gigi molar ketiga melalui pemeriksaan radiografi sebagai penunjang odontektomi.
Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI), [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-5, may 2020.
ISSN 2686-1321.
Available at: <http://jurnal.pdgi.or.id/index.php/jrdi/article/view/467>. Date accessed: 26 apr. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.32793/jrdi.v4i1.467.
Section
Review Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
