Analysis of peri-implant tissue post-implantation using periapical radiograph: a scoping review

  • Lazaro Nehemia Benedict Dilens Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjajaran
  • Azhari Azhari Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132
  • Farina Pramanik Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132

Abstract

Objectives: This review article is aimed to review various studies evaluating changes in peri-implant height and bone density post-implantation using periapical radiographs.
Review: This scoping review was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review (PRISMA-Scr) by reviewing literatures related to the evaluation of peri-implant bone post-implantation using periapical radiographs. PRISMA-ScR is a guide for writing a scoping review to increase the relevance and transparency of methodological and research findings. Literature searches were performed on PubMed NCBI, Science Direct, EBSCOHost, and Clinicalkey databases with the keywords “((dental implant) AND (periapical radiograph)) AND (peri-implant) OR (alveolar bone))”. Literature screening was carried out based on the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria that have been set in journals published in 2016-2020. A total of 18 eligible studies were included in this study. The data from the included studies was then synthesized, and the literatures were reviewed.
Conclusion: Peri-implant bone generally experiences a decrease in height (marginal bone loss) and an increase in density during the process of bone adaptation to functional loading. The design and placement techniques of the implants have an impact on the extent of the change in bone height.

Author Biographies

Azhari Azhari, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132
Staff
Farina Pramanik, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132
Staff

References

Rizkillah MN, Isnaeni RS, Putri R, Fadilah N. Pengaruh kehilangan gigi posterior terhadap kualitas hidup pada kelompok usia 45-65 tahun. Padjadjaran J Dent Res Student. 2018;2(2):1–7.
Elani HW, Starr JR, Da Silva JD, Gallucci GO. Trends in Dental Implant Use in the U.S., 1999–2016, and Projections to 2026. J Dent Res. 2018;97(13):1424–30.
Harsono V, Prabowo H. Implan dental sebagai perawatan alternatif untukrehabilitasi kehilangansebuah gigi. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci. 2012;11(3):170.
Kurnia DL, Ramadhani A, Hudyono R. Implant Gigi One-Piece vs Two-Pieces dalam Praktek Sehari-Hari. Maj Kedokt Gigi Indones. 2014;21(2):149.
Warreth A, Ibieyou N, O’Leary RB, Cremonese M, Abdulrahim M. Dental implants: An overview. Dent Update. 2017;44(7):596–620.
Vaidya P, Mahale S, Kale S, Patil A. Osseointegration- A Review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(01):45–8.
Irandoust S, Müftü S. The interplay between bone healing and remodeling around dental implants. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–10.
Hupp JR. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 7th. Vol. 7, Elsivier. 2019. 112-114,132 p.
Iskandar H, Nlcnik P, Sijaya S, Pengajai S, Kedokteran R. Radiografi Untuk Perawatan Implan Gigi.
Kumar S, Muthulingam V, Tharani P. Factors involving in dental implant failure - A review. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2020;7(5):1621–5.
Ramanauskaite A, Juodzbalys G. Diagnostic Principles of Peri-Implantitis: a Systematic Review and Guidelines for Peri-Implantitis Diagnosis Proposal. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016;7(3):1–15.
Nagarajan A, Perumalsamy R, Thyagarajan R, Namasivayam A. Diagnostic Imaging for Dental Implant Therapy. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014;4(2).
Gupta S, Patil N, Solanki J, Singh R, Laller S. Oral implant imaging: A review. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2015;22(3):7–17.
Yunus B, Dharmautama D. Penilaian penempatan implan sebelum dan sesudah pemasangan implan gigi dengan pemeriksaan radiografi periapikal. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci [Internet]. 2009;8(2):88–94.
Yunus B. Kriteria Dental Implan Sebelum dan Sesudah Penempatan Dengan Gambaran Radiografi Panoramik. Dentika: Dental Journal. 2010 Jul 7;15(1):24-6.
Veronese E, Veronese M, Sivolella S, Grisan E. A radiographic-based method for marginal bone loss measurement in dental implants. Proc - Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2013;129–32.
Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M, Petersson A. Digital radiography in general dental practice: A field study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2007;36(5):249–55.
Ibrahim N, Parsa A, Hassan B, Van Der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: A literature review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2013;42(3).
De Bruyn H, Vandeweghe S, Ruyffelaert C, Cosyn J, Sennerby L. Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri-implant health. Periodontol 2000. 2013;62(1):256–70.
Landes CA, Shohmelian J, Mavrogenis AF, Dimitriou R, Parvizi J, Babis GC, et al. How are implants placed? Univ Connect Heal Cent. 2011;103(2):e22-5.
Dewi L, Widyasari R. Evaluasi Radiografis Kehilangan Tulang Alveolar Sekitar Implan Gigi Setelah 1 Tahun Fungsional Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin, Usia, dan Panjang Implan. LPPM-Unjani. 2015;1(1):33-8
Terheyden H, Lang NP, Bierbaum S, Stadlinger B. Osseointegration - communication of cells. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(10):1127–35.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.
Grewal A, Kataria H, Dhawan I. Literature search for research planning and identification of research problem. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(9):635–9.
Ramachandran A, Singh K, Rao J, Mishra N, Jurel SK, Agrawal KK. Changes in alveolar bone density around immediate functionally and nonfunctionally loaded implants. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2016;115(6):712–7.
Mendoza-Azpur G, Lau M, Valdivia E, Rojas J, Muñoz H, Nevins M. Assessment of Marginal Peri-implant Bone-Level Short-Length Implants Compared with Standard Implants Supporting Single Crowns in a Controlled Clinical Trial: 12-Month Follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36(6):791–5.
De Francesco M, Gobbato E, Noce D, Cavallari F, Fioretti A. Clinical And Radiographic Evaluation Of Single Tantalum Dental Implants: A Prospective Pilot Clinical Study. Oral Implantol (Rome) [Internet]. 2016 Oct 2;9(Supp1):38–44.
Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Brandetti G, Calasso S. A 36-month follow-up prospective cohort study on peri-implant bone loss of Morse Taper connection implants with platform switching. J Oral Sci [Internet]. 2016 Mar;58(1):49–57.
Nemli SK, Güngör MB, Aydın C, Yılmaz H, Bal BT, Arıcı YK. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study. J Dent Sci [Internet]. 2016;11(1):29–34.
Cassetta M, Driver A, Brandetti G, Calasso S. Peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched Morse taper connection implants: a prospective 60-month follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;45(12):1577–85.
Moergel M, Rocha S, Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F, Wagner W. Radiographic evaluation of conical tapered platform-switched implants in the posterior mandible: 1-year results of a two-center prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jun;27(6):686–93.
Ho KN, Salamanca E, Lin HK, Lee SY, Chang WJ. Marginal Bone Level Evaluation after Functional Loading Around Two Different Dental Implant Designs. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1472090.
Lago L, da Silva L, Gude F, Rilo B. Bone and Soft Tissue Response in Bone-Level Implants Restored with Platform Switching: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(4):919–26.
Giacomel MC, Camati P, Souza J, Deliberador T. Comparison of Marginal Bone Level Changes of Immediately Loaded Implants, Delayed Loaded Nonsubmerged Implants, and Delayed Loaded Submerged Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(3):661–6.
Salamanca E, Lin JC, Tsai CY, Hsu YS, Huang HM, Teng NC, et al. Dental Implant Surrounding Marginal Bone Level Evaluation: Platform Switching versus Platform Matching-One-Year Retrospective Study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7191534.
Gatti C, Gatti F, Silvestri M, Mintrone F, Rossi R, Tridondani G, et al. A Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiographic Crestal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants Placed at Crestal or Subcrestal Level: One-Year Findings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(4):913–8.
Teixeira M, Rego M, Silva M, et al. Bacterial Profile and Radiographic Analysis Around Osseointegrated Implants With Morse Taper and External Hexagon Connections: Split-Mouth Model. J Oral Implantol. 2019 Dec;45(6):469–73.
Rahman SA, Muhammad H, Haque S, Alam MK. Periodic Assessment of Peri-implant Tissue Changes: Imperative for Implant Success. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Feb;20(2):173–8.
Sanchez RM, Delgado-Muñoz JM, Figallo MA, Martín MG, Lagares DT, Pérez JL. Analysis of marginal bone loss and implant stability quotient by resonance frequency analysis in different osteointegrated implant systems. Randomized prospective clinical trial. Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa. 2019;24(2):2:260-4
Lago L, da Silva L, Martinez-Silva I, Rilo B. Radiographic Assessment Of Crestal Bone Loss In Tissue-Level Implants Restored By Platform Matching Compared With Bone-Level Implants Restored By Platform Switching: A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Mouth Trial With 3-Year Follow-Up. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2019 Jan 1;34(1).:179–86.
Pan YH, Lin HK, Lin JC, Hsu YS, Wu YF, Salamanca E, Chang WJ. Evaluation of the peri-implant bone level around platform-switched dental implants: a retrospective 3-year radiographic study. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019 Jan;16(14):2570.
Estévez-Pérez D, Bustamante-Hernández N, Labaig-Rueda C, et al. Comparative Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Loss in Extra-Short, Short, and Conventional Implants. A 3-Year Retrospective Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 Jan;17(24):9278.
Parithimarkalaignan S, Padmanabhan T V. Osseointegration: An update. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(1):2–6.
44. Geraets W, Zhang L, Liu Y, Wismeijer D. Annual bone loss and success rates of dental implants based on radiographic measurements. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2014;43(7):3–5.
Javed F, Ahmed H, Crespi R, Romanos G. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013;5(4):162–7.
Elsayed MD. Biomechanical Factors That Influence the Bone-Implant-Interface. Res Rep Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;3(1):1–14.
Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(3):242–8.
Karthik K, Sivakumar, Sivaraj, Thangaswamy V. Evaluation of implant success: A review of past and present concepts. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(SUPPL.1):117–20.
Prawoko SS, Nelwan LC, Odang RW, Kusdhany LS. Correlation between radiographic analysis of alveolar bone density around dental implant and resonance frequency of dental implant. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017;884(1).
Guarnieri R, Miccoli G, Seracchiani M, D’Angelo M, Di Nardo D, Testarelli L. Changes of Radiographic Trabecular Bone Density and Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Vertical Dimensions Around Non-Submerged Dental Implants with a Laser-Microtextured Collar after 5 Years of Functional Loading. Open Dent J. 2020;14(1):226–34.
Published
2022-04-30
How to Cite
DILENS, Lazaro Nehemia Benedict; AZHARI, Azhari; PRAMANIK, Farina. Analysis of peri-implant tissue post-implantation using periapical radiograph: a scoping review. Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI), [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 31-40, apr. 2022. ISSN 2686-1321. Available at: <http://jurnal.pdgi.or.id/index.php/jrdi/article/view/739>. Date accessed: 10 aug. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.32793/jrdi.v6i1.739.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.