Bone height and width evaluation before dental implant placement on panoramic radiographs: a scoping review

  • Shely Levita Asmarani Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132
  • Azhari Azhari Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132
  • Farina Pramanik Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone height and its width on panoramic radiography prior to dental implant placement.
Review: This study was carried out using scoping review methods. The referenced articles were published between 2010-2021 in English or Indonesian. The search was performed using PubMed and PMC database with keywords “(((Evaluation) AND (Presurgical)) AND (Dental Implant)) AND (Radiograph)) AND (Panoramic)” and Science Direct with keywords "presurgical evaluation dental implant in panoramic radiograph". Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Scoping Review (PRISMA-Scr) was utilized to perform the article finding process. It is found that the height of alveolar bone after being assessed by panoramic radiograph is between 7.95-23.42 mm while the alveolar bone width is between 7.04-10.41 mm.
Conclusion: Panoramic radiograph can be performed to evaluate bone height and width before the dental implant placement procedure.

Author Biographies

Shely Levita Asmarani, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132
Undergraduate Student
Azhari Azhari, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132
Staff
Farina Pramanik, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 40132
Staff

References

Siagian KV. Kehilangan sebagian gigi pada rongga mulut. Jurnal e-CliniC. 2016;4(1):1-6.
Mangkat Y, Wowor VNS, Mayulu N. Pola Kehilangan Gigi Pada Masyarakat Desa Roong Kecamatan Tondano Barat Minahasa Induk. Jurnal e-GIGI. 2015;3(2):508-14.
Yunus B. Optimalisasi radiografi gigi konvensional untuk membantu pemasangan implan gigi. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci. 2009;8(1):11-7.
Yunus B. Dental Implant Criteria Before And After Placement With Panoramic Radiography. Dentika Dent J. 2010;15(1):24–46.
Ananda N, Sulistyani LD, Bachtiar EW. Pertimbangan Penggunaan Implan Gigi pada Lansia. Insisiva Dent J Maj Kedokt Gigi Insisiva. 2017;6(1):47–55.
Raymond HW, Zwiebel WJ, Schwartz JD. 25th year of publication of Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004;25(1):1.
Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U, Bernard JP. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: A prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):81–5.
Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Lindh C, Pereira AC, Rohlin M. Ambiguity in bone tissue characteristics as presented in studies on dental implant planning and placement: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(8):789–801.
Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, et al. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2013;42(2):20110429.
Majid I, Mukith ur Rahaman S, Sowbhagya M, Alikutty F, Kumar H. Radiographic prescription trends in dental implant site. J Dent Implant. 2014;4(2):140-3.
Göçmen G, Özkan Y. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Dental Implants. In (Ed.), Paranasal Sinuses. London: IntechOpen; 2017. 
Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(3):242–8.
Observations I, History P. Section III Preoperative General Assessment and Treatment Planning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(2):10–4.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract. 2005;8(1):19–32.
Sucharew H, Macaluso M. Methods for research evidence synthesis: The scoping review approach. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(7):416–8.
Argosurio YN. Penatalaksanaan Implan Gigi pada Penderita Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 (Studi Pustaka). Skripsi. FKG—USAKTI; 2014. p.8–45.
Patel P, Shah J, Dudhia B, Butala P. Presurgical assessment of alveolar ridge dimensions before dental implant procedures by OPG&CBCT – A comparative study based on fryback & thornbury model. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2020;32(3):229-34.
Fortes JH, de Oliveira-Santos C, Matsumoto W, da Motta RJG, Tirapelli C. Influence of 2D vs 3D imaging and professional experience on dental implant treatment planning. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(2):929–36.
Apaydin BK, Yasar F, Kizildağ A, Tasdemir OU. Accuracy of digital panoramic radiographs on the vertical measurements of dental implants. Cumhur Dent J. 2018;21(3):209–15.
Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Kim JD. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2011;40(2):76–83.
Athota A, Gandhi Babu D, Nagalaxmi V, Raghoji S, Waghray S, Reddy C. A comparative study of digital radiography, panoramic radiography, and computed tomography in dental implant procedures. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2017;29(2):106-10.
Dau M, Edalatpour A, Schulze R, Al-Nawas B, Alshihri A, Kämmerer PW. Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(2):20160081.
Sahota J, Bhatia A, Gupta M, Singh V, Soni J, Soni R. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(8):665–9.
Özalp Ö, Tezerişener HA, Kocabalkan B, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Özarslan MM, Şimşek Kaya G, et al. Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018;48(4):269–75.
Pertl L, Gashi-Cenkoglu B, Reichmann J, Jakse N, Pertl C. Preoperative assessment of the mandibular canal in implant surgery: comparison of rotational panoramic radiography (OPG), computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for preoperative assessment in implant surgery. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013;6(1):73–80.
Hu KS, Choi DY, Lee WJ, Kim HJ, Jung UW, Kim S. Reliability of two different presurgical preparation methods for implant dentistry based on panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in cadavers. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012 Apr;42(2):39-44.
Angelopoulos C, Thomas S, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. Comparison Between Digital Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for the Identification of the Mandibular Canal as Part of Presurgical Dental Implant Assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(10):2130–5.
Waasdorp J. Enucleation of the incisive canal for implant placement: A comprehensive literature review and case report. J Oral Implantol. 2016;42(2):180–3.
Castro MA, Lagravere-Vich MO, Amaral TM, Abreu MH, Mesquita RA. Classifications of mandibular canal branching: A review of literature. World J Radiol. 2015 Dec 28;7(12):531-7.
Bagchi P, Joshi N. Role of Radiographic Evaluation in Treatment Planning for Dental Implants: A Review. J Dent Allied Sci. 2012;1(1):21-5.
Published
2022-12-26
How to Cite
ASMARANI, Shely Levita; AZHARI, Azhari; PRAMANIK, Farina. Bone height and width evaluation before dental implant placement on panoramic radiographs: a scoping review. Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI), [S.l.], v. 6, n. 3, p. 133-138, dec. 2022. ISSN 2686-1321. Available at: <http://jurnal.pdgi.or.id/index.php/jrdi/article/view/891>. Date accessed: 23 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.32793/jrdi.v6i3.891.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.