The correlation of the change in vertical angulation of the beam in the bisecting technique to the length of the tooth
Abstract
Objectives: To find out the correlation between changes in vertical angle beam in periapical radiography of bisecting techniques to the length dimension of the tooth.Materials and Methods: This study was a study using laboratory experimental methods. The samples used in this study were incisor 1, incisor 2, canine, premolar 1, premolar 2, molar 1, and molar 2 region 1. Based on the results of the minimum number of samples at G*power, measures of effect size f (0.4512937), α err prob (0.05), power (1-β err prob) (0.8), number of groups (5), number of measurements (2), corr among rep measurements (0.6), nonpersphericity correction € ( (1). All teeth are treated in the form of a change in angle from the standard angle recommended by White and Pharoah to -10°, -5°, 0°, +5°, +10° , +10° in each tooth using the Dental X-ray unit of Veraview V080 type EX-2 70 kV. 7 mA.
Results: Based on Saphiro-Wilk, Kruskall-Wallis, and Paired t-test tests, it is known that there is a significant relationship between the actual length of the tooth and the length of the radiograph result in the change of angle + foreshortening, and the change of angle - the elongation. However, this does not apply to molar teeth 1 and 2 at positive angle changes However, this does not apply to molar teeth 1 and 2. A change in angle -10° is a change in angle with a better degree.
Conclusion: There is a correlation between the change in vertical angle beam in the periapical radiography of bisecting techniques to the length dimension of the tooth.
References
Desyaningrum H, Epsilawati L, Rusyandi Y. Karakteristik kerusakan tulang alveolar pada penderita periodontitis kronis dan agresif dengan pencitraan Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Padjadjaran J Dent Res Students. 2017;1(1):139-44.
Carestream Dental. Dental Radiography Series. Carestream Health, Inc. 2016 [Cited on 2022]. Accessed on https://www.carestream.com/en/us/-/media/publicsite/products_and_solutions/dental/pdf/8170_us_exposure__processing_broch.pdf?sc_lang=en
Dayo AF, Wolff MS, Syed AZ, Mupparapu M. Radiology of Dental Caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2021;65(3):428-30.
Kusumawati KY, Yanuaryska RD. The accuracy of extraoral periapical radiography on determining the working length in endodontic treatment : narrative review. 2022;6(1).41-8.
Ramadhan AZ, Sitam S, Azhari A, Epsilawati L. Gambaran kualitas dan mutu radiograf. J Radiol Dentomaksilofasial Indones. 2020;3(3):43-8.
Gupta A, Devi P, Srivastava R, Jyoti B. Intra oral periapical radiography - basics yet intrigue: A review. Bangladesh J Dent Res Educ. 2014;4(2):83–7.
Whaites E, Drage N. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology. 6th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. p.117.
Williamson GF. Intraoral Radiography : Positioning and Radiation Protection. ADA CERP; 2006.
Anggara A, Iswani R, Darmawangsa D. Perubahan Sudut Penyinaran Vertikal pada Bisecting Tecnique Radiography Terhadap Keakuratan Dimensi Panjang Gigi Premolar Satu Atas. J B-Dent. 2018;5(1):1–8.
White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiography Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier;2014. p.91-113.
Cyntia D. Gambaran Rata-Rata Panjang Gigi Premolar Rahang Atas dan Rahang Bawah Menggunakan Radiografi Periapikal Digital Antara Teknik Paraleling dan Bisekting ( Penelitian In Vitro ). Skripsi. Universitas Sumatera Utara. 2021. p.31.
Vasconcelos K de F, Rovaris K, Nascimento EHL, Oliveira ML, Távora D de M, Bóscolo FN. Diagnostic accuracy of phosphor plate systems and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated internal root resorption. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75(8):573-6.
Yoon DC, Mol A, Benn DK, Benavides E. Digital Radiographic Image Processing and Analysis. Dent Clin North Am. 2018;62(3):341-59.
Takeshita WM, Iwaki LCV, Da Silva MC, Tonin RH. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography in the assessment of alveolar bone loss. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014;5(3):318-23.
Yueniwati Y, Rachmawati YL, Prismahany IP. Apical Cuts off as the Highest Prevalence of Errors during the Process of Periapical Radiograph Bisecting Technique by Dentistry Students. Indones Med Life Sci J. 2021;1(1):8–14.
Carestream Dental. Dental Radiography Series. Carestream Health, Inc. 2016 [Cited on 2022]. Accessed on https://www.carestream.com/en/us/-/media/publicsite/products_and_solutions/dental/pdf/8170_us_exposure__processing_broch.pdf?sc_lang=en
Dayo AF, Wolff MS, Syed AZ, Mupparapu M. Radiology of Dental Caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2021;65(3):428-30.
Kusumawati KY, Yanuaryska RD. The accuracy of extraoral periapical radiography on determining the working length in endodontic treatment : narrative review. 2022;6(1).41-8.
Ramadhan AZ, Sitam S, Azhari A, Epsilawati L. Gambaran kualitas dan mutu radiograf. J Radiol Dentomaksilofasial Indones. 2020;3(3):43-8.
Gupta A, Devi P, Srivastava R, Jyoti B. Intra oral periapical radiography - basics yet intrigue: A review. Bangladesh J Dent Res Educ. 2014;4(2):83–7.
Whaites E, Drage N. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology. 6th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. p.117.
Williamson GF. Intraoral Radiography : Positioning and Radiation Protection. ADA CERP; 2006.
Anggara A, Iswani R, Darmawangsa D. Perubahan Sudut Penyinaran Vertikal pada Bisecting Tecnique Radiography Terhadap Keakuratan Dimensi Panjang Gigi Premolar Satu Atas. J B-Dent. 2018;5(1):1–8.
White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiography Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier;2014. p.91-113.
Cyntia D. Gambaran Rata-Rata Panjang Gigi Premolar Rahang Atas dan Rahang Bawah Menggunakan Radiografi Periapikal Digital Antara Teknik Paraleling dan Bisekting ( Penelitian In Vitro ). Skripsi. Universitas Sumatera Utara. 2021. p.31.
Vasconcelos K de F, Rovaris K, Nascimento EHL, Oliveira ML, Távora D de M, Bóscolo FN. Diagnostic accuracy of phosphor plate systems and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated internal root resorption. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75(8):573-6.
Yoon DC, Mol A, Benn DK, Benavides E. Digital Radiographic Image Processing and Analysis. Dent Clin North Am. 2018;62(3):341-59.
Takeshita WM, Iwaki LCV, Da Silva MC, Tonin RH. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography in the assessment of alveolar bone loss. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014;5(3):318-23.
Yueniwati Y, Rachmawati YL, Prismahany IP. Apical Cuts off as the Highest Prevalence of Errors during the Process of Periapical Radiograph Bisecting Technique by Dentistry Students. Indones Med Life Sci J. 2021;1(1):8–14.
Published
2023-04-29
How to Cite
NABIHAH, Kharidah Khairullah; LUBIS, Muhammad Novo Perwira.
The correlation of the change in vertical angulation of the beam in the bisecting technique to the length of the tooth.
Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI), [S.l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 15-20, apr. 2023.
ISSN 2686-1321.
Available at: <http://jurnal.pdgi.or.id/index.php/jrdi/article/view/978>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.32793/jrdi.v7i1.978.
Section
Original Research Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
