Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in diagnosing root canal configuration: a literature review
Abstract
Objectives: This review article aims to describe the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in diagnosing root canal configuration.Review: This study is a literature review consisting of English articles about the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in diagnosing root canal configuration, published in 2013 – 2023. The article search databases used were Pubmed and Science Direct with the keyword “(cone-beam computed tomography[MeSH Terms]) AND (configuration, root canal[MeSH Terms]).” The selected articles were screened by checking the publication year, duplicating articles, reading the titles and abstracts, and the entire article's contents. The total search results for articles based on keywords obtained were 205 and only seven were included. In order to successfully perform root canal treatment, thorough knowledge of the root canal configuration is essential. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can improve our understanding of root canal configuration. The development of CBCT has brought to light the disadvantages of conventional radiography, which include the compression of three-dimensional anatomy, geometric distortion, and anatomical noise.
Conclusion: Radiology is essential in treatment planning, disease monitoring, and assessmen t of treatment outcomes. The development of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers three-dimensional accuracy with a reasonable cost, no geometric distortion and anatomical noise, and the ability to create cross-sectional images, revolutionizing the imaging of dentomaxillofacial structures. This imaging system has been shown to overcome some of the limitations of conventional radiography.
References
Sirinimitpol C, Banomyong D, Yanpiset K. Sensitivity and specificity of cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography in the detection of calcified root canals. Journal Thai Endodontic Association. 2022;94(1):94-102.
Yang H, Tian C, Li G, Yang L, Han X, Wang Y. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars and the location of root canal orifices and apical foramina in a Chinese subpopulation. Journal of Endodontics. 2013;39(4):435–8.
Bashir, Muhammad & Ahmed, Imtiaz. 3D Evaluation of Root Canal Configuration of Mandibular Premolars Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry. 2021;10(04):37-43.
Svetlozarova S. Cone Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Tool in Endodontics - A Review of the Literature. Advances in Dentistry & Oral Health. 2019;11(2):80-5.
Maity I, Das UK. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A new horizon in clinical endodontics. Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics. 2016;1(3):69-75.
Kongkiatkool, P., Puapichartdumrong, P., Tantanapornkul, W., Piyapattamin, T., & Wisithphrom, K. Accuracy of Digital Periapical Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Root Canal Configuration in Human Mandibular First Premolars. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2020;13(1):80-5.
Khanna AB. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Evidence-Based Endodontics. 2020;5(1):1-16.
Kiran KN, Merwade S, Prabakaran P, Laxmi PCH, Annapoorna BS, Guruprasad CN. Magnetic resonance imaging versus cone beam computed tomography in diagnosis of periapical pathosis – A systematic review. Saudi Dental Journal. 2021;33:784–94.
Karobari MI, Parveen A, Mirza MB, Makandar SD, Nik Abdul Ghani NR, Noorani TY, et al. Root and Root Canal Morphology Classification Systems. International Journal of Dentistry. 2021;1-6.
Bansal R, Hegde S, Astekar MS. Classification of Root Canal Configurations: A Review and a New Proposal of Nomenclature System for Root Canal Configuration. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. 2018;12(5):1-5.
Baxter S, Jablonski M, Hülsmann M. Cone-beam-computed-tomography of the symmetry of root canal anatomy in mandibular incisors. Journal of oral science. 2020;62(2): 180-3.
Pan JYY, Parolia A, Chuah SR, Bhatia S, Mutalik S, Pau A. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(14):1-15.
Buchanan GD, Gamieldien MY, Tredoux S, Vally ZI. Root and canal configurations of maxillary premolars in a South African subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography and two classification systems. Journal of Oral Science. 2020;62(1):93–7.
Ahmed HMA, Ibrahim N, Mohamad NS, Nambiar P, Muhammad RF, Yusoff M, et al. Application of a new system for classifying root and canal anatomy in studies involving micro-computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: Explanation and elaboration. International Endodontic Journal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2021;54:1056–82.
Matus F. Unusual root and canal morphology of the mandibular first molar as an indication for cone-beam computed tomography: About a “borderline” endodontic case. Odontoestomatologia. 2022;24(39):1-9.
Mohsen Pourian M, Javadi AA, Yazdizadeh M. The accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of the number of root canals: An in vitro study. Caspian J Dent Res. 2021;10:57–63.
Hegde NM, Hegde P, Shetty A, Rao LN, Varghese, Litty. Cone beam Computed tomography in Endodontics: An overview.Research and Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences. 2014;2(14):12-7.
Adel M, Tofangchiha M, Atash Biz Yeganeh L, Javadi A, Azari Khojasteh A, Moradi Majd N. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Conventional Periapical Radiography in Detecting Strip Root Perforations. Journal of International Oral Health. 2016;8(1):75-9.
Shokri A, Eskandarloo A, Noruzi-Gangachin M, Khajeh S. Detection of root perforations using conventional and digital intraoral radiography, multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontic. 2015;40(1):58.
Metsälä E, Henner A, Ekholm M. Quality assurance in digital dental imaging: A systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. Informa Healthcare; 2014;72:362–71.
Kajan ZD, Taramsari M, Fard NK, Kanani M. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in comparison with standard method in evaluating root canal morphology: An in vitro study. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2018;13(2):181-7.
Khalifa S, Amer W, Abdullah A. Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Standard Resolution In Detection of Mesiobuccal Root Canal Anatomical Variations in Maxillary Molars. Dental Science Updates. 2023;4(1):149–59.
Arslan H, Ertas H, Tarim Ertas E, Kalabalik F, Saygili G, Davut Capar I. Evaluating root canal configuration of mandibular incisors with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish population. Journal of Dental Science. 2015;10(4):359–64.
Asgary S, Nikneshan S, Akbarzadeh-Bagheban A, Emadi N. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and dimensional measurements by using CBCT in mandibular first molars. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2016;8(1):1–8.
Aung NM, Myint KK. Diagnostic Accuracy of CBCT for Detection of Second Canal of Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Dentistry. Hindawi Limited. 2021:1-18.
Bansode PV, Pathak SD, Gite SP, Pagare JS, Wavadhane MB, Khedgikar SB. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A New Boon and a Ray of Hope to the Endodontist-A Series of Cases. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2015;5(4):101–9.
Sagale A, Ramugade M, Ganga R. Endodontic management of mandibular second premolar with type IX canal configuration using cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic aid: A rare case report. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2018;9(5):180–4.
Meena N, Kowsky RD. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics: A Review. Dentistry. 2014;4(7):1-9.
Yang H, Tian C, Li G, Yang L, Han X, Wang Y. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars and the location of root canal orifices and apical foramina in a Chinese subpopulation. Journal of Endodontics. 2013;39(4):435–8.
Bashir, Muhammad & Ahmed, Imtiaz. 3D Evaluation of Root Canal Configuration of Mandibular Premolars Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry. 2021;10(04):37-43.
Svetlozarova S. Cone Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Tool in Endodontics - A Review of the Literature. Advances in Dentistry & Oral Health. 2019;11(2):80-5.
Maity I, Das UK. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A new horizon in clinical endodontics. Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics. 2016;1(3):69-75.
Kongkiatkool, P., Puapichartdumrong, P., Tantanapornkul, W., Piyapattamin, T., & Wisithphrom, K. Accuracy of Digital Periapical Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Root Canal Configuration in Human Mandibular First Premolars. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2020;13(1):80-5.
Khanna AB. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Evidence-Based Endodontics. 2020;5(1):1-16.
Kiran KN, Merwade S, Prabakaran P, Laxmi PCH, Annapoorna BS, Guruprasad CN. Magnetic resonance imaging versus cone beam computed tomography in diagnosis of periapical pathosis – A systematic review. Saudi Dental Journal. 2021;33:784–94.
Karobari MI, Parveen A, Mirza MB, Makandar SD, Nik Abdul Ghani NR, Noorani TY, et al. Root and Root Canal Morphology Classification Systems. International Journal of Dentistry. 2021;1-6.
Bansal R, Hegde S, Astekar MS. Classification of Root Canal Configurations: A Review and a New Proposal of Nomenclature System for Root Canal Configuration. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. 2018;12(5):1-5.
Baxter S, Jablonski M, Hülsmann M. Cone-beam-computed-tomography of the symmetry of root canal anatomy in mandibular incisors. Journal of oral science. 2020;62(2): 180-3.
Pan JYY, Parolia A, Chuah SR, Bhatia S, Mutalik S, Pau A. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(14):1-15.
Buchanan GD, Gamieldien MY, Tredoux S, Vally ZI. Root and canal configurations of maxillary premolars in a South African subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography and two classification systems. Journal of Oral Science. 2020;62(1):93–7.
Ahmed HMA, Ibrahim N, Mohamad NS, Nambiar P, Muhammad RF, Yusoff M, et al. Application of a new system for classifying root and canal anatomy in studies involving micro-computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: Explanation and elaboration. International Endodontic Journal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2021;54:1056–82.
Matus F. Unusual root and canal morphology of the mandibular first molar as an indication for cone-beam computed tomography: About a “borderline” endodontic case. Odontoestomatologia. 2022;24(39):1-9.
Mohsen Pourian M, Javadi AA, Yazdizadeh M. The accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of the number of root canals: An in vitro study. Caspian J Dent Res. 2021;10:57–63.
Hegde NM, Hegde P, Shetty A, Rao LN, Varghese, Litty. Cone beam Computed tomography in Endodontics: An overview.Research and Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences. 2014;2(14):12-7.
Adel M, Tofangchiha M, Atash Biz Yeganeh L, Javadi A, Azari Khojasteh A, Moradi Majd N. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Conventional Periapical Radiography in Detecting Strip Root Perforations. Journal of International Oral Health. 2016;8(1):75-9.
Shokri A, Eskandarloo A, Noruzi-Gangachin M, Khajeh S. Detection of root perforations using conventional and digital intraoral radiography, multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontic. 2015;40(1):58.
Metsälä E, Henner A, Ekholm M. Quality assurance in digital dental imaging: A systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. Informa Healthcare; 2014;72:362–71.
Kajan ZD, Taramsari M, Fard NK, Kanani M. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in comparison with standard method in evaluating root canal morphology: An in vitro study. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2018;13(2):181-7.
Khalifa S, Amer W, Abdullah A. Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Standard Resolution In Detection of Mesiobuccal Root Canal Anatomical Variations in Maxillary Molars. Dental Science Updates. 2023;4(1):149–59.
Arslan H, Ertas H, Tarim Ertas E, Kalabalik F, Saygili G, Davut Capar I. Evaluating root canal configuration of mandibular incisors with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish population. Journal of Dental Science. 2015;10(4):359–64.
Asgary S, Nikneshan S, Akbarzadeh-Bagheban A, Emadi N. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and dimensional measurements by using CBCT in mandibular first molars. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2016;8(1):1–8.
Aung NM, Myint KK. Diagnostic Accuracy of CBCT for Detection of Second Canal of Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Dentistry. Hindawi Limited. 2021:1-18.
Bansode PV, Pathak SD, Gite SP, Pagare JS, Wavadhane MB, Khedgikar SB. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A New Boon and a Ray of Hope to the Endodontist-A Series of Cases. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2015;5(4):101–9.
Sagale A, Ramugade M, Ganga R. Endodontic management of mandibular second premolar with type IX canal configuration using cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic aid: A rare case report. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2018;9(5):180–4.
Meena N, Kowsky RD. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics: A Review. Dentistry. 2014;4(7):1-9.
Published
2024-08-20
How to Cite
NISRINA, Nur Asmy; YUNUS, Barunawaty.
Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in diagnosing root canal configuration: a literature review.
Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI), [S.l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 79-88, aug. 2024.
ISSN 2686-1321.
Available at: <http://jurnal.pdgi.or.id/index.php/jrdi/article/view/1184>. Date accessed: 14 oct. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.32793/jrdi.v8i2.1184.
Section
Review Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
